A letter from Ivo of Chartres (1100-1104)
Sender
Ivo of ChartresReceiver
Adela of England, Countess of BloisTranslated letter:
Ivo, humble minister of the church of Chartres, to Adela, excellent countess, greetings and the gift of prayers. I have heard that you claim/impose a banlieu [area of jurisdiction*] from our archpriest Raoul because of a certain false nun, whose possessions which he found at the home of a certain burgher of Blois he seized. Wherefore we ask and admonish your excellency that you not inflict this injury on us. For all false preachers, false monks, false clerics, fornicators, adulterers, usurers, and others who commit offenses against Christianity (except those punishable by capital punishment), are supposed to be distrained and corrected by us; they and their things are under our jurisdiction. This is the ancient and inviolable custom, not only of the church of Chartres, but of all French churches in the whole kingdom of the Gauls. And we are prepared to demonstrate this either in our church or in any church which can give canonical judgment on us. Let your prudence therefore stop what has been started and, just as you wish to have your princely rule inviolate, so you should permit the church to have its rights. Do not let your excellency hold it against us, because we love you and what is yours and we would only reluctantly attempt anything against you, even with good reason. May your prudence know that what your agents did to the foresaid archpriest we take very seriously but we will overlook it because of our love for you. However if things take a turn for the worse, [God] forbid, we will treat them severely according to our office. Fare well.
Original letter:
Ivo, humilis ecclesiae Carnotensis minister, Adelae excellenti Comitiasse salutem et orationum munus. Audivi quod a Radulfo archipresbytero nostro bannum-leugae requiritis propter quamdam pseudo-monachum, cujus reculas saisivit, quas apud quemdam burgensem Blesensem invenit. Unde rogamus et monemus excellentiam vestram, ut hanc nobis non inferatis injuriam. Omnes enim pseudo-praedicatores, et pseudo-monachi, et pseudo-clerici, fornicatores, adulteri, feneratores, et alii qui in christianismo offendunt (exceptis his qui poena capitali puniendi sunt), a nobis distringendi et corrigendi sunt, et ipsi et eorum res nostri sunt juris. Et haec est antiqua et inconcussa consuetudo, non tantum Carnotensis ecclesie, sed omnium ecclesiarum per totum regnum Galliarum: et hoc adstruere parati sumus, sive in ecclesia nostra, sive in omni ecclesia quae canonicum super nos possit facere judicium. Cesset ergo a tali incoepto prudentia vestra; et sicut in[con]cussum vultis habere principatum vestrum, sic ecclesiam permittite habere jus suum. Nec obsit nobis apud excellentiam vestram, quod vos et vestra diligimus, et inviti adversum vos aliquid, etiam ratione movente, attentamus. Sciat autem prudentia vestra, quia quod fecerunt ministri vestri in praedictum archipresbyterum, graviter ferimus, sed propter dilectionem vestram dissimulamus. Sed si res in pejus ( quod absit! ) se verterit, adhuc ab eis pro officio nostro districte exigemus. Valete.Historical context:
The letter deals with a jurisdictional dispute between church and secular authority caused over the case of a false nun.Scholarly notes:
* Bannileuga can be both the area delimited where a lord's authority runs and/or fines for infractions committed within it (LoPrete in a private communication).